Factors contributing to telemedicine efficacy in pediatric urology.

INTRODUCTION: Despite swift implementation of telemedicine with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there is a paucity of research on its use for management of pediatric urology patients. Specifically, there is limited knowledge and inconsistent data on the effectiveness of telemedicine for various pediatric urologic conditions. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of pediatric urological care provided via video visits (VVs) at a large tertiary care children's hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective assessment of pediatric urology patients younger than 21 years who had a VV between 5/18/2022 and 5/17/2023. New patients with a testicular diagnosis were not eligible for VVs. After entering the diagnosis and submitting billing using a modifier for telemedicine, clinicians were mandated to select whether the VV allowed for: complete case management (CCM), suboptimal case management (SCM), or incomplete case management (ICM) requiring an in-person visit. Case management categorizations were analyzed according to patient pathology, visit type (i.e., new or established), and patient-centered variables including age, sex, race, insurance type, need for an interpreter, and distress score [a proxy for socioeconomic status]. RESULTS: During the one-year period, there were 3267 telemedicine patients with a median age of 9 years (IQR 3-13) and 57.0% were male. Most VVs (89.3%) were established encounters. Almost 12% of telemedicine patients had external organ pathology (EOP, e.g., phimosis), 43.0% had internal organ pathology (IOP, e.g., hydronephrosis), and 45.1% had functional urological pathology (FUP, e.g., dysfunctional voiding). Clinicians deemed 96.9%, 2.7%, and 0.5% of VVs as having CCM, SCM or ICM, respectively. Telemedicine patients with IOP or FUP were more likely to have CCM, than those with EOP (98.5% and 97.8% vs 87.1%, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, patient age, pathology, and visit type were predictive of VV efficacy. DISCUSSION: Now that telemedicine use has slowed, it is necessary to evaluate and establish its optimal role in pediatric urology. Factors associated with VV efficacy included older patient age, internal organ or functional urological pathology, and established encounters. The long-term success of telemedicine requires suitable patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is quite effective for the management of a wide variety of pediatric urology patients. Continued evaluation of telemedicine, including multi-institutional investigation and corroboration, is necessary for the development of evidence-based best practice guidelines regarding appropriate, safe, and effective integration of telemedicine that drives pediatric urological care forward to meet the demands of the future.

Surgeon, and Institution Characteristics Associated Surgical Preferences in the Pediatric KIDney Stone Care Improvement Network.

OBJECTIVE: To reveal barriers and opportunities to implement evidence for the management of pediatric kidney stone disease, we determined surgeon and institutional factors associated with preferences for the type of surgical intervention for kidney and ureteral stones. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of urologists participating in the Pediatric KIDney Stone Care Improvement Network (PKIDS) trial. Questionnaires ascertained strengths of urologists' preferences for types of surgery as well as characteristics of participating urologists and institutions. The outcome was the strength of preferences for ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for four scenarios for which two alternative procedures are recommended by the AUA guidelines: (1) 2 cm kidney stone, (2) 9 mm proximal ureteral stone, (3) 1.5 cm lower pole kidney stone, (4) 1 cm nonlower pole kidney stone. Principal component analysis was performed to identify unique clusters of factors that explain surgical preferences. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight urologists at 29 sites completed surveys. Stated preferences were highly skewed except for the choice between ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a 1.5 cm kidney stone. Shockwave lithotripsy ownership and local practice patterns most frequently associated with the strength of surgeons' preferences for the type of surgery. Principal component analysis revealed that three clusters of stone, patient, and heterogenous characteristics explained 30% of the variance in preferences. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the strengths of preferences for surgical interventions supported by current guidelines that are partially explained by surgeon and institutional characteristics. These results reveal opportunities to develop strategies for guidelines that consider real-world drivers of care.

Elevating pediatric urology care: The crucial role of nursing research in quality improvement.

This educational article highlights the critical role of pediatric urology nursing research in improving the care of children with urological conditions. It discusses the multifaceted nature of pediatric urology nursing, addresses challenges such as limited nurse scientists and resource constraints, and highlights the need to overcome barriers to increase research involvement. The authors emphasize the importance of prioritizing research areas, the promotion of collaboration, and the provision of adequate funding and academic time for pediatric nurses to contribute to evidence-based practice, to improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of research in advancing nursing practice, shaping protocols, and advocating for the rights and needs of children with urological conditions and their families.

Urology Mythbusters: Does prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux in children vary by race?

In this edition of Mythbusters, we examine the premise that prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children varies by race. Specifically, we consider whether there is evidence supporting the contention that VUR is more common in White children and less common in Black children. Statements regarding the lower prevalence of VUR in Black children are ubiquitous in both research papers and reviews. Many of the references cited in support of these statements do not actually support the existence of racial variation in VUR, due to uncontrolled single-arm study designs, highly selected samples at risk for bias, or simply not addressing VUR prevalence at all. There is a small group of studies which directly compared VUR prevalence among children undergoing cystography, and these studies have found VUR to be less common among Black children compared to White children. However, the results of such papers can only be considered in the context of a system in which systemic bias and racism may impact access and care delivery in profound ways. Given that race is a social construct that bears little relationship to shared genetic ancestry or underlying biological characteristics, these findings must be approached with extreme caution. The goals of pediatric urological care should be to confer equitable care to all young children regardless of race.

The importance of animal specificity in animal experimentation, part I: Anatomy in relation to pediatric urology.

Why and when is animal experimentation relevant? The answer to this question depends on the research question. In this short educational article we aim to raise awareness of the importance of formulating a very specific research question before choosing an animal species. An awareness of anatomical and physiological differences vis-a-vis similarities between species, will increase the potential for obtaining data that is relevant for translation to human conditions.

The importance of animal specificity in animal experimentation, part II: Physiological challenges and opportunities in relation to pediatric urology.

When performing animal experimentation in Pediatric Urology studies, it is important to be aware of physiological differences between species and to understand when relevant disease models are available. Diseased animal models may be more relevant in many cases, rather than performing studies in healthy and normally developed animals. For example, they may be more appropriate for the study of congenital malformations, to investigate the secondary effects of prenatal urinary obstruction, to study the effect of prenatal exposure to endogenous or exogenous factors which may lead to disease, or in testing bioengineered structures. In this short educational article, we aim to describe some disease models that have been used to simulate human pathologies and how, if properly designed, these studies can lead to important new knowledge for human translation. In addition, we also highlight the importance of formulating a research question(s) before deciding on the animal experimental model and species to choose.

A machine learning algorithm predicting risk of dilating VUR among infants with hydronephrosis using UTD classification.

BACKGROUNDS: Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) classification has been designed to be a more objective grading system to evaluate antenatal and post-natal UTD. Due to unclear association between UTD classifications to specific anomalies such as vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR), management recommendations tend to be subjective. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a model to reliably predict VUR from early post-natal ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: Radiology records from single institution were reviewed to identify infants aged 0-90 days undergoing early ultrasound for antenatal UTD. Medical records were reviewed to confirm diagnosis of VUR. Primary outcome defined as dilating (≥Gr3) VUR. Exclusion criteria include major congenital urologic anomalies (bilateral renal agenesis, horseshoe kidney, cross fused ectopia, exstrophy) as well as patients without VCUG. Data were split into training/testing sets by 4:1 ratio. Machine learning (ML) algorithm hyperparameters were tuned by the validation set. RESULTS: In total, 280 patients (540 renal units) were included in the study (73 % male). Median (IQR) age at ultrasound was 27 (18-38) days. 66 renal units were found to have ≥ grade 3 VUR. The final model included gender, ureteral dilation, parenchymal appearance, parenchymal thickness, central calyceal dilation. The model predicted VUR with AUC at 0.81(0.73-0.88) on out-of-sample testing data. Model is shown in the figure. DISCUSSION: We developed a ML model that can predict dilating VUR among patients with hydronephrosis in early ultrasound. The study is limited by the retrospective and single institutional nature of data source. This is one of the first studies demonstrating high performance for future diagnosis prediction in early hydronephrosis cohort. CONCLUSIONS: By predicting dilating VUR, our predictive model using machine learning algorithm provides promising performance to facilitate individualized management of children with prenatal hydronephrosis, and identify those most likely to benefit from VCUG. This would allow more selective use of this test, increasing the yield while also minimizing overutilization.

Vesicoureteral Reflux: Current Care Trends and Future Possibilities.

Although investigations over the past 2 decades have improved our understanding of the natural history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and helped identify those at higher risk of both VUR itself as well as its potential severe sequelae, debate exists regarding key aspects of care, including when to perform diagnostic imaging and which patients benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to distill large volumes of granular data into practical tools that clinicians can use to guide diagnosis and management decisions. Surgical treatment, when indicated, remains highly effective and is associated with low morbidity.

Is cerebral palsy associated with successful ureteral access during the initial attempt at ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in children and young adults?

BACKGROUND: Ureteroscopy is a common treatment for urolithiasis, but initial ureteral access is not always possible, particularly in pediatrics. Clinical experience suggests that neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy (CP) may facilitate access, thus avoiding the need for pre-stenting and staged procedures. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if probability of successful ureteral access (SUA) during initial attempted ureteroscopy (IAU) is higher in pediatric patients with CP vs. without CP. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed IAU cases for urolithiasis (2010-2021) at our center. Patients with pre-stenting, prior ureteroscopy, or urologic surgical history were excluded. CP was defined using ICD-10 codes. SUA was defined as scope access to urinary tract level sufficient to reach stone. Association of CP and other factors with SUA were evaluated. RESULTS: 230 patients (45.7% male, median age: 16 years [IQR: 12-18 y], 8.7% had CP) underwent IAU, with SUA in 183 (79.6%). SUA occurred in 90.0% of patients with CP vs. 78.6% of those without CP (p = 0.38). SUA was 81.7% in patients >12 years (vs. 73.8% in those <12), and the highest SUA was in those >12 years with CP (93.3%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Renal stone location was significantly associated with lower SUA (p = 0.007). Among patients with renal stone only, SUA in those with CP was 85.7% vs. 68.9% in those without CP (p = 0.33). SUA did not differ significantly by gender or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: CP may facilitate ureteral access during IAU in pediatric patients, but we were unable to show a statistically significant difference. Further study of larger cohorts may demonstrate whether CP or other patient factors are associated with successful initial access. Improved understanding of such factors would help preoperative counseling and surgical planning for children with urolithiasis.

Accuracy of telemedicine for diagnosis and pre-operative assessment of pediatric penile conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with penile conditions comprise a significant proportion of any pediatric urology practice, and physical examination is the mainstay of diagnosis for such conditions. While the rapid adoption of telemedicine (TM) facilitated access to pediatric urology care during the pandemic, the accuracy of TM-based diagnosis for pediatric penile anatomy and pathology has not been studied. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of TM-based evaluation of pediatric penile conditions by comparing diagnosis during the initial virtual visit (VV) with a subsequent in-person visit (IPV). We also sought to assess the agreement between scheduled and actual surgical procedure performed. METHODS: A single-institution prospective database of male patients less than 21 years of age who presented for evaluation of penile conditions between August 2020 and December 2021 was analyzed. Patients were included if they had an IPV with the same pediatric urologist within 12 months of the initial VV. Diagnostic concordance was based on a surgeon-reported survey of specific penile diagnoses, completed at both initial VV and follow-up IPV. Surgical concordance was assessed based on the proposed versus billed CPT code(s). RESULTS: Median age among 158 patients was 10.6 months. The most frequent VV diagnoses were penile adhesions (n = 37), phimosis (n = 26), "other" (n = 24), post-circumcision redundancy (n = 18), and buried penis (n = 14). Initial VV and subsequent IPV diagnoses were concordant in 40.5% (64/158); 40/158 (25%) had partial concordance (at least one diagnosis matched). There was no difference in age, race, ethnicity, median time between visits, or device type between patients with concordant vs. discordant diagnoses. Of 102 patients who underwent surgery, 44 had VV only while 58 had IPV prior to surgery. Concordance of scheduled versus actual penile surgery was 90.9% in those patients who only had a VV prior to surgery. Overall, surgery concordance was lower among those with hypospadias repairs vs. non-hypospadias surgery (79.4% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among pediatric patients being evaluated by TM for penile conditions, there was poor agreement between VV-based and IPV-based diagnoses. However, besides hypospadias repairs, agreement between planned and actual surgical procedures performed was high, suggesting that TM-based assessment is generally adequate for surgical planning in this population. These findings leave open the possibility that, among patients not scheduled for surgery or IPV, certain conditions might be misdiagnosed or missed entirely.

Characterizing digital access in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND: Virtual medicine has the potential to improve access for underserved populations by facilitating timely remote evaluation. However, challenges in the real-world implementation of this technology may paradoxically exacerbate health disparities. We sought to characterize families' digital access and how social determinants of health may impact virtual medicine access within pediatric urology. We hypothesized that disadvantaged socioeconomic status would be a barrier to virtual medicine access. STUDY DESIGN: A digital access screening tool was prospectively developed and launched in July 2021. Schedulers are prompted to complete this optional screening questionnaire at the time of patient intake, for video or in-person encounters. The parent is screened for access to a device and reliable internet or cellular data that could be used to participate in a video visit. These represented the primary study outcomes. A modality preference for an in-person visit, video visit, or no preference was also recorded. Patient demographics were retrospectively evaluated, and socioeconomic status was estimated using the Distressed Communities Index generated for each patient's zip code. For each zip code, the Distressed Communities Index produces a normalized, comparative distress score ranging from 0 ("prosperous") to 100 ("distressed"). RESULTS: 3885 patients were included, with median age of 5 years (IQR 1-11). Almost 74% were male, 71.3% were White, 20.9% had public insurance, and 2.9% required an interpreter. The median distress score was 14.2 (IQR 7.2-27.5). Screening revealed that 136 families (3.5%) lacked digital access. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, insurance type (p = 0.0020) and distress score (p = 0.0125) were significant predictors of digital access (Summary Table). Those patients who lacked access to a device (p < 0.0001) or reliable internet/cellular data (p < 0.0001) were more likely to prefer an in-person visit. DISCUSSION: Family screening revealed that there is a small but significant proportion of families who lack digital access, and this cohort disproportionately represents underserved communities with higher distress scores, likely reflecting lower socioeconomic status. Those families without digital access were more likely to prefer an in-person visit. Improved identification of these socially complex "at-risk" patients can assist in the development of more inclusive health care strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the chance for virtual medicine to expand access for underserved populations, lack of digital tools may hinder its potential impact on health disparities in pediatric urology. Ongoing digital access screening and further studies are needed to design interventions tailored to the specific needs of our patients, allowing for more equitable pediatric urological care.